1
|
citizen participation
|
Brazil
|
In Brazil, citizen participation is characterized by active grassroots movements, involvement in social and political causes, and a tradition of protest and advocacy.
|
5
|
2
|
citizen participation
|
Singapore
|
Citizen participation in Singapore is tightly regulated to prevent social instability and dissent.
|
2
|
3
|
citizen participation
|
Western democracies
|
Citizen participation is valued and encouraged in Western democracies.
|
2
|
4
|
citizen participation
|
African countries with political instability
|
In African countries with political instability, citizen participation may be limited by authoritarian governance and political unrest.
|
1
|
5
|
citizen participation
|
Asian countries with authoritarian tendencies
|
In Asian countries with authoritarian tendencies, citizen participation is carefully managed with regulations and limitations to control dissent and maintain social stability.
|
1
|
6
|
citizen participation
|
Authoritarian countries
|
In authoritarian countries, citizen participation is controlled and manipulated by the ruling regime.
|
1
|
7
|
citizen participation
|
Democratic countries
|
In democratic countries, citizen participation in decision-making processes is encouraged and valued.
|
1
|
8
|
citizen participation
|
Egypt
|
In Egypt, political unrest and authoritarian governance may limit meaningful citizen participation in decision-making processes.
|
1
|
9
|
citizen participation
|
Latin American countries
|
Citizen participation in Latin American countries is known for vibrant grassroots movements and active involvement in social and political causes, reflecting a tradition of protest and advocacy.
|
1
|
10
|
citizen participation
|
Middle Eastern countries
|
Citizen participation in Middle Eastern countries is limited and decision-making is centralized among a select few.
|
1
|
11
|
citizen participation
|
Nondemocratic countries
|
In nondemocratic countries, citizen participation in decision-making processes is limited and often controlled by the government.
|
1
|
12
|
citizen participation
|
Qatar
|
Citizen participation in Qatar is limited and political decision-making is often reserved for a select few.
|
1
|
13
|
citizen participation
|
Scandinavian countries
|
Scandinavian countries deeply value citizen participation in local decision-making and have a strong tradition of grassroots democracy.
|
1
|
14
|
citizen participation
|
South Africa
|
Citizen participation in South Africa recognizes and incorporates the diversity of the population in political decision-making and community initiatives.
|
1
|
15
|
citizen participation
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland's culture emphasizes citizen-driven initiatives and direct democracy in local governance decision-making.
|
1
|
16
|
citizen participation
|
Totalitarian states
|
In totalitarian states, citizen participation is heavily controlled and limited by the state.
|
1
|
17
|
citizen participation
|
Turkmenistan
|
In Turkmenistan, citizen participation is heavily controlled by the state, with limited opportunities for free expression and genuine involvement in decision-making processes.
|
1
|
18
|
citizen participation
|
Western European countries
|
In Western European countries, citizen participation in local governance emphasizes citizen-driven initiatives and direct democracy practices.
|
1
|
19
|
citizen participation
|
Zimbabwe
|
In Zimbabwe, citizen participation may be limited by political unrest and authoritarian governance.
|
1
|